Comments on: Some Rails perf numbers on JRuby 1.1.1 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/ ... finding time to write something useful is nontrivial ... Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:58:34 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Huikau? » Blog Archive » JRuby slowdown from Rails 2.0.2 to 2.1.0 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/comment-page-1/#comment-216 Huikau? » Blog Archive » JRuby slowdown from Rails 2.0.2 to 2.1.0 Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:21:26 +0000 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/#comment-216 [...] you may want to take a look at the performance. I was running the console benchmark from this blog post with jruby trunk and saw some numbers I wasn’t [...] [...] you may want to take a look at the performance. I was running the console benchmark from this blog post with jruby trunk and saw some numbers I wasn’t [...]

]]> By: Huikau? » Blog Archive » Some Rails perf numbers on JRuby 1.1.1 part 2 (Linux, JDK 6) http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/comment-page-1/#comment-162 Huikau? » Blog Archive » Some Rails perf numbers on JRuby 1.1.1 part 2 (Linux, JDK 6) Thu, 01 May 2008 19:20:56 +0000 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/#comment-162 [...] this post, I got a lot of suggestions to re-run the benchmarks using JDK 6. I’ll let you read the [...] [...] this post, I got a lot of suggestions to re-run the benchmarks using JDK 6. I’ll let you read the [...]

]]> By: Mike McKinney http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/comment-page-1/#comment-154 Mike McKinney Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:10:57 +0000 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/#comment-154 Charles: just used Google Docs Spreadsheet and the newly integrated graphs... Charles: just used Google Docs Spreadsheet and the newly integrated graphs…

]]> By: Charles Oliver Nutter http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/comment-page-1/#comment-153 Charles Oliver Nutter Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:42:20 +0000 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/#comment-153 Very nice graphs. I've learned from this post that really BIG blocks provide better visual cues. And the numbers look pretty good. I can't wait to see your Java 6 numbers. Of course there's always more work to do; we should be faster than this. Very nice graphs. I’ve learned from this post that really BIG blocks provide better visual cues.

And the numbers look pretty good. I can’t wait to see your Java 6 numbers. Of course there’s always more work to do; we should be faster than this.

]]> By: ANdrew http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/comment-page-1/#comment-152 ANdrew Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:30:06 +0000 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/#comment-152 I heared JRuby is quite faster on JVM 6. I heared JRuby is quite faster on JVM 6.

]]> By: Vladimir Sizikov http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/comment-page-1/#comment-151 Vladimir Sizikov Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:12:52 +0000 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/#comment-151 Interesting numbers, thanks for posting them! Also, JRuby on JDK 6 should be a bit faster, at least on Linux. In case if you see any noticeable/obvious performance issues with JRuby, please file them in our Issue Tracker: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY Interesting numbers, thanks for posting them! Also, JRuby on JDK 6 should be a bit faster, at least on Linux.

In case if you see any noticeable/obvious performance issues with JRuby, please file them in our Issue Tracker: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY

]]> By: LeonB http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/comment-page-1/#comment-150 LeonB Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:00:03 +0000 http://blog.huikau.com/2008/04/29/some-rails-perf-numbers-on-jruby-111/#comment-150 Nice post! I always read Charles Nutter recommending Java 6 for running jruby. It's supposedly much faster with jruby. Maybe nice to add to the tests? Nice post!

I always read Charles Nutter recommending Java 6 for running jruby. It’s supposedly much faster with jruby. Maybe nice to add to the tests?

]]>