<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syntactic Sugar&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.huikau.com/2008/05/27/syntactic-sugar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.huikau.com/2008/05/27/syntactic-sugar/</link>
	<description>... finding time to write something useful is nontrivial ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 03:58:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Harrah</title>
		<link>http://blog.huikau.com/2008/05/27/syntactic-sugar/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Harrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.huikau.com/2008/05/27/syntactic-sugar/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I know you&#039;re a big fan of Ruby, Mike, and rightly so.  You also know how hesitant I have been to make the dynlang leap.  Interesting that you mention Groovy, because I&#039;ve been playing with it a little recently and I really like what I see.  And it is definitely loaded with syntactic sugar.  I&#039;m usually not a big fan of syntactic sugar, but with expressivity being a key concern for dynlangs, I am surprisingly accepting of it in Groovy (and to a lesser degree Ruby which I don&#039;t know very well, but I&#039;ve liked what I&#039;ve seen).

Good article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you&#8217;re a big fan of Ruby, Mike, and rightly so.  You also know how hesitant I have been to make the dynlang leap.  Interesting that you mention Groovy, because I&#8217;ve been playing with it a little recently and I really like what I see.  And it is definitely loaded with syntactic sugar.  I&#8217;m usually not a big fan of syntactic sugar, but with expressivity being a key concern for dynlangs, I am surprisingly accepting of it in Groovy (and to a lesser degree Ruby which I don&#8217;t know very well, but I&#8217;ve liked what I&#8217;ve seen).</p>
<p>Good article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
